Our People

Biosketch
In 1991 Dr Fearnhead completed a BSc. in Pharmacology and Toxicology at the London School of Pharmacy, before being awarded a PhD. in 1995 by the University of Leicester for work perfomed att the MRC-Toxicology Centre. From '95 to '99 Dr Fearnhead was a post-doctoral fellow at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY before moving to the National Cancer Institute in Maryland as a principal investigator. In 2004 Dr Fearnhead moved to the National Centre of Biomedical Engineering Science (NCBES), National University of Ireland, Galway and in 2006 was appointed a lecturer in Pharmacology and Therapeutics (http://www.nuigalway.ie/pharmacology).
Research Interests
All our cells carry a genetic program that enables a cell to quickly and cleanly kill itself, a form of cell death called apoptosis. This program is found in all metazoans examined and plays important roles at different stages of an organism?s life. Apoptosis is activated at various stages during normal embryonic development, removing unwanted cells and so sculpting our tissue and organs. It is also activated in bacterially or virally infected cells and serves to limit the success of these pathogens. Apoptosis is also a stress response, acting to remove damaged cells that can no longer serve a purpose or that pose a threat to the organism as a whole. A failure in the regulation of apoptosis is associated with auto-immune diseases and degenerative diseases (too much apoptosis) and cancer (too little apoptosis).

Programmed cell death or apoptosis is of fundamental importance to cancer as it both limits tumorigenesis and is also triggered by many cancer chemotherapeutics. Importantly, cancer cells often acquire mutations that compromise the apoptotic process, allowing these cells both to escape normal growth constraints and to become resistant to many anti-cancer drugs, resulting in the emergence of drug-resistant malignancies. Thus discovering how apoptosis is regulated and why it fails in cancer is central both to understanding cancer progression and developing new therapies to counter chemo-resistant cancers.

Biochemical and genetic studies in a range of model systems have identified the key components of the apoptotic machinery. One gene family that contributes to the commitment to apoptosis and execution of the death program encodes a family of cysteine proteases called caspases. Caspases are expressed in cells as inactive zymogens and are activated at the onset of apoptosis. In many cases (but not all) this is sufficient to kill the cell. Different types of apoptotic signals initiate apoptosis by activating different ?initiator? caspases. These ?initiator? caspases then activate a common set of ?effector? caspases by proteolysis. Ultimately, it is these effector caspases that produce the apoptotic phenotype by cleaving a wide range of intracellular substrates.

Caspases also play non-apoptotic roles, being important in the regulation of inflammation. More recently, caspases normally associated with inducing cell death have also been implicated in the induction of differentiation of stem and progenitor cells.
Research Collaborators

Caspases and Differentiation

The caspases comprise a family of cysteine proteases and some of the family are responsible for causing apoptosis.  Of the apoptotic caspases, caspases-3,-6 and -7 are classed as ?effectors? and cleave a wide range of intracellular proteins and responsible for causing many of the changes typical of apoptosis.   Effectors are expressed as zymogens and are activated when cleaved by ?initiator? caspases such as -2, -8 and -9.  Initiators are also expressed as zymogens but, in contrast to effectors, are activated by their recruitment into large multi-protein complexes.  Different apoptotic signals activate different initiators, but all the initiators activate a common set of effectors.  Thus, during apoptosis very different pro-apoptotic signals are all integrated and amplified through a proteolytic cascade of initiator and effector caspase activity.  Implicit in this model is that the activity of initiator and effector caspases is synonymous with apoptosis and that once effectors are active an irreversible choice has been made.

Not all caspases are involved in apoptosis; caspases-1, -4 and -5 are involved in inflammatory responses where they are important for the proteolytic maturation of cytokines.  The specificity of caspases for a particular process is defined by the selective cleavage of substrate; inflammatory caspases preferentially bind and cleave cytokines, while apoptotic caspases cleave a different set of proteins.  It is therefore remarkable that the apoptotic effector caspase, caspase-3 is not only required for the differentiation of muscle progenitor cells into myofibers but apparently is sufficient for this differentiation.

To date there is no explanation that reconciles the apoptotic activity of caspase-3 with its role in differentiation.  The explanation of how a cell containing active caspase-3 retains the ability to choose a fate other than apoptosis is likely to be critical for our understanding of how cells make life-and-death decisions.  It may also have important implications beyond muscle biology; mutations that allow cells to avoid apoptosis contribute to tumourigenesis and uncovering a mechanism through which cells survive despite the presence of active caspase-3 may reveal new pathways important in cancer cell biology.

Figure. Myoblast differentiation into myotube; cell fusion and expression of myosin heavy chain detected by immunofluorescence.  A caspase inhibitor compromises differentiation.

 

Putative Serine proteases and apoptosis

Many chemotherapeutics exert their anti-cancer activity through the induction of programmed cell death or apoptosis. Much recent research into the mechanisms of apoptosis has identified new therapeutic targets within the apoptotic machinery and is driving the development of novel chemotherapeutics. Proteases, most notably the caspase cysteine proteases, are critical in the induction of apoptosis. However, roles for serine proteases have also been suggested based, in part, on the ability of protease inhibitors like N-a-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) to block apoptosis. Despite these data, the relevant target for TPCK has not been identified. Identifying this target is the first step in assessing whether it represents a valid target for cancer chemotherapy. The research aims to identify TPCK targets by a biochemical approach and then to use a genetic approach to test the roles of these candidates in apoptosis.

MicroRNAs, apoptosis and cancer

Breast cancers are phenotypically diverse, presumably reflecting a spectrum of distinct molecular defects in processes controlling cell proliferation and survival. This complexity makes breast cancer progression hard to predict and treatment difficult to manage. Currently, clinicians rely heavily on the status of two receptors, the estrogen receptor and HER2/neu receptor for clinical decisions relating to prognosis and treatment. These markers, while enormously valuable, do not adequately define different types of breast cancers or predict their sensitivity to therapy.

Teaching

Training and Supervision

  • Supervising Ph.D students
  • Supervising MSc research projects
  • Supervising UREKA students
  • Lecturing to MSc students on apoptosis
  • Lecturing in Pharmacology and Therapeutics to undergraduate Pharmacology, nursing and medical students
 

Guidelines for research training in the Caspase Laboratory

 

The Student

 The student is a candidate with a BSc. or MSc. deemed a suitable recruit to the research group by the supervisor. The goal of the PhD. student is to gain skills in critical thought, experimental design, technique and interpretation, scientific writing and presentation and so make a contribution to scientific understanding in their chosen field. In doing so, the student will earn a PhD.
 

The Supervisor

The supervisor recruits the student and has overall responsibility for managing the resources supporting the student?s research. The supervisor will aid and guide the student in making a scientific contribution in their chosen field.
 

Organisation

 
 In the event a serious conflict arises between the Student and the Panel that cannot be resolved by the students and the Panel working together, the student is encouraged to approach their mentor (a PI outside the cluster), the Department Head or the Dean for aid and advice.
 

Expections

 
What the student can expect:

1. Project with clearly defined goals and timeline
2. Appropriate equipment to achieve the stated objectives
3. Regular access to supervisor
4. An advisory panel for the student
5. A mentor (academic staff member outside the cluster) for pastoral care
6. Support in the development of critical thinking
7. Support in the development of skills in planning and execution of experiments
8. Training and guidance in scientific writing and presentation
9. Collegial treatment from supervisors and co-workers
10. Compliance with all Health and Safety regulations
 

What the supervisor can expect:

1. Full-time commitment to the project and timely completion of a PhD. thesis in accordance with NUIG policy
2. Development of critical thinking
3. Professional laboratory behaviour
4. Completion of 2 (yearly) interim reports
5. Participation in the research activities of the whole group
6. Positive contribution to the running and maintenance of the laboratory
7. Compliance with all Health and Safety regulations

Timeline:

Year 1
  1. Register for MSc.
  2. Take scientific writing course in conjunction of the taught MSC. course with NCBES
  3. Prepare written report and report first years? progress and future goals
  4. Recommendation by advisory panel for continuation into PhD. program
Year 2
  1. Prepare written report and report first years? progress and future goals
  2. Practice viva voce at end of year
Year 3
  1. Review and critique two grants supplied by the supervisor
  2. Viva voce
  3. Degree awarded at the end of three years